We reported how Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey tried to justify banning the leader of the free world from his site as well as a boatload of other folks on the right, including folks whose only ‘crime’ seems to have been posting about legal documents that made Democrats look bad.
Project Veritas then dropped a video on Jack showing that it went far beyond Trump and that they anticipated it was going to go on long past the inauguration. Can we say “new normal,” people? Comply with our new media overlords now, children, or if not prepare to have your accounts wiped.
Now Project Veritas has a new video out, showing that it isn’t even only just about the United States where they intend to crackdown, they’re applying this to the whole world and apply the things they learned in other places to the United States. This is indeed what the leaders of Germany and Mexico were concerned about when they criticized President Donald Trump being booted. Not just because they thought it was wrong, but also because they could so easily see themselves or their interests being next on the target list. Israeli National News just called it what it is: political censorship on a global scale.
Vijaya Gadde is Twitter’s Legal, Policy and Trust & Safety head. She’s actually the person who was behind banning Trump, she told Jack while he was sunning himself in French Polynesia.
“We’ve seen violence unfold as a result of misleading information or coded rhetoric…”
— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) January 18, 2021
So Gadde makes it clear they’re going to be more aggressive in going after people for ‘inflammatory comments,” “conspiracies,” “misleading information” and “coded rhetoric.”
But who decides whether a “conspiracy” is true? Who decides what is “misleading information” and “coded rhetoric?” What the heck even is “coded rhetoric.” I don’t know but don’t engage in it on Twitter, lest the ban hammer falls! Based on what we’ve seen so far what will prevail is the Democratic narrative. Boatloads of Russian collusion conspiracy is still up on Twitter, not one person that I know of was ever booted from Twitter for that fakery. What about the Hunter Biden email evidence that broke in October that Joe Biden had met with one of Hunter’s Ukrainian business connections in contradiction to what Biden had previously said? A significant percentage of Americans said had they known that, they would not have voted for Biden. Twitter blocked their ability to know that falsely claiming the material was hacked. But now we know that Hunter Biden is under investigation by the FBI and they’ve been looking into the emails, so Twitter basically blocked real news at a critical point in the election.
They said they had been and would be inserting themselves to stop people from spreading inflammatory content such as election interference, election fraud, anything around stealing the election.
If they are inserting themselves into that game to decide what is “true” and what is not true, then, if they want to act like publishers then they shouldn’t have any protections and get nailed for all the things publishers get nailed for.
This pretty much breaks down what we have to expect.
— James Lindsay, king of your mom (@ConceptualJames) January 18, 2021
View original Post